Monthly Archive: August, 2005

Former Chinese Diplomat Describes “Seething Underclass”

Chen Yonglin, the Chinese diplomat who recently defected in Australia, has a new interview out with the Washington Diplomat. If he’s right, the little grey men in the Forbidden City might want to reread the parts of The Communist Manifesto that talked about alienation and class warfare: In a series of interviews in the U.S. and Australian press, Chen repeatedly characterized the Chinese government as “evil” and described a vast network of secret Chinese spies who had infiltrated the United...

NYT on the USFK and Talks Delay

The New York Times has two articles of interest. The first is a detailed report on how U.S. force structure in Korea will change. It relies heavily on an interview with Gen. Leon LaPorte, the USFK Commanding General. The other discusses the North Korean decision not to return to the talks next week. Interestingly, North Korea uses the more transparent excuse of the annual US-ROK military exercises rather than focusing on Jay Lefkowitz’s appointment as Special Envoy for Human Rights....

News Summary

China and North Korea have a new treaty on the processing of refugees . . . as something other than refugees. Thanks to Chinese concepts of open government, opaque writing from the Chosun Ilbo, and a generous ladle-full of South Korean government doublespeak, I have almost no idea what the agreement would actually do, which probably means, “nothing good.” _____________________ A new poll finds that 67% of people are either dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with President Roh Moo Hyun, who...

Carnival of the Revolutions, 29 August 2005

Welcome to the Carnival of the Revolutions edition for August 29th. Hosting next week’s edition (Sept. 5) will be Thinking-East; next up (Sept. 12) is Quid Nimis. Updates added, typos fixed. East Asia and the Pacific Rim Burma: Did the government’s army use chemical weapons against Karen rebels earlier this year? The Jubilee Campaign, a Christian human rights NGO, prints an editorial by Lord David Alton, a member of the British House of Lords. Publius reports on new rumors of...

The HRC Responds, Part I

My August 8th e-mail to South Korea’s Human Rights Commission was a two-parter–a complaint, and at the bottom of the letter, a question. Let’s take them in inverse order, because a week ago, the HRC did in fact respond to my request for clarification of one point, about its allegedly delayed report on Human Rights in North Korea (scroll down): Our committee didn’t intented not to open this results [to the public]. The media misunderstood that as not [making the...

The HRC Responds, Part II

The other part of my e-mail to the Human Rights Committee was a complaint. You’d think it subject matter would have been obvious enough from the subject line: Complaint–discrimination based on race and national origin Here, in relevant part, is what it said: I am [my bad; should have said was] an American soldier who spent four years defending your human rights. Today, I am an activist for withdrawing US forces from Korea, and for promoting human rights for North...

Engaging the North Korean People

One of my main criticisms of the South Korean view of engagement is that it’s seldom permitted to include the people of North Korea. It often reaches the South Korean people, of course, but only with a carefully scripted portrayal of the North as benign and neighborly. Most engagement with the North thus far has been South Korean state welfare for the North’s government and government-owned industries. See through the schmaltzy emotionalism of this report of a South Korean singer’s...

Does North Korea Have a “Right” to a Nuclear Program?

In response to an earlier comment, I went and dug up the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and did some analysis. The answer is yes, but with strict conditions that North Korea has not met. I thought the comment worthy of a post on the main page, so I reproduce it, slightly edited, here. ________________ First, I place very little value on what the NPT does and does not allow in a case like this one. What can you say about the...

Talks Update: Did the U.S. Cave?

Take everything you read in this post with extra skepticism, because the reports this week are even less consistent than usual. The main questions this week surround Pyongyang’s claim on a right to “peaceful” nuclear programs. Amid recent signs that the U.S. was ready to cave on that and other issues in the wake of Anti-Unification Minister Chung Dong-Young publicly taking Pyongyang’s side, the U.S. and South Korean positions aren’t exactly manifest. The Chosun Ilbo reports on South Korean Foreign...

Feds Break Up Chinese Gang that Trafficked N. Korean “Supernotes”

Don’t let the entertainment value fool you. This one appears to have been a bust of major significance, which the feds claim “decapitated” one of the largest crime syndicates operating in the United States: The guests thought they were headed to an early afternoon wedding on a yacht docked near Atlantic City. They ended up in jail instead, courtesy of an elaborate ruse by federal authorities hoping to bust up an international smuggling ring. Lengthy undercover investigations on opposite sides...

112481550928953713

Breakthrough or Cave-In? The AP, via the N.Y. Times, is reporting rumors that all six nations may be prepared to agree in principle on a path toward an eventual peace treaty with North Korea. Even North Korea’s demand for “peaceful” nuclear power–a demand no doubt emboldened by the statements of our former South Korean ally–is described by Chris Hill as “not a show-stopper.” If so–and it’s not so yet–it’s disturbing. One wonders how well we would bear up under similar...